Function & immunity
Summary updated Topic baseline checked Review coverage

A summary update checks selected findings. It does not mean every program, safety question or access detail was reviewed again. Source and event dates remain attached to their findings below.

Selected current fields reviewed October 9, 2026. Stronger prior evidence and unchanged programs retain their original sources. This does not advance the full-topic successful-check date; the research log states remaining gaps.

Topic baseline checked coverage: Selective starting brief; source-access and evidence limits are documented in the topic page. Informal-source coverage was not exhaustive.

Read the dated research notes

Non-opioid pain treatments

SL1002 completes pivotal knee-OA pain enrollment, with Q2 2027 results forecast. Suzetrigine adds a randomized knee-replacement opioid-sparing trial and closes its uncontrolled diabetic-neuropathy extension enrollment; chronic-pain approval and comparative benefit remain unproven.

Where things stand

Established uses

Suzetrigine, sold as Journavx, has FDA approval for moderate-to-severe acute pain in adults, based on short postoperative trials.

In development

SL1002 completes pivotal knee-OA pain enrollment, with Q2 2027 results forecast. Suzetrigine adds a randomized knee-replacement opioid-sparing trial and closes its uncontrolled diabetic-neuropathy extension enrollment; chronic-pain approval and comparative benefit remain unproven.

Key finding

NOHARM covered 68,141 surgical procedures: opioid exposure fell modestly (rate ratio .90, 95% CI .82–.99), but pain interference and physical function did not improve.

Main uncertainty

The radiculopathy study reported nearly identical pain reductions with suzetrigine and placebo, so it does not demonstrate efficacy beyond placebo.

What comes next

Q2 2027 BEACON topline, sponsor forecast.

Selected findings from the dated research notes; not an exhaustive treatment guide.

Recent developments

All signals
Visualizations & development timelines

The medical frontier

Explore these programs by development stage and mechanism.

Research notes

Open a finding or program for its evidence, limitations and next milestones. Dated checks include their coverage and remaining gaps.

Focused update — 2026-10-16

No additional finding was selected from these checked sources. Coverage remains incomplete; this is not a full-topic “no news” conclusion.

Remaining gaps: All saved named registry records and every page of bounded September 5–October 16 CT.gov discovery were retrieved; 58 discovery records were screened selectively. Retrieval is not full appraisal. Worldwide registries, all publications/regulatory files, complete harms and original audio/transcripts remain incomplete. Prior full successful-check dates are preserved. New named-program and postoperative-protocol checks did not supply a selected additional event; this is not a complete no-news conclusion.

Informal-source coverage: Targeted Reddit, interview, podcast and saved unresolved-claim searches were appraised selectively; original recordings and worldwide informal coverage remain incomplete. Routine anecdotes and reposts were not treated as new trial evidence. Journavx patient comments concern subjective experience or access, without independently verified development milestones.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-10-13

No additional finding was selected from these checked sources. Coverage remains incomplete; this is not a full-topic “no news” conclusion.

Remaining gaps: All saved named registry records retrieved and all pages of bounded September5/6–October13 CT.gov discovery downloaded; 52 records screened selectively. Retrieval is not full appraisal. Worldwide registries, all publications/regulatory files, comprehensive harms and full audio/transcripts remain incomplete; prior full successful-check dates preserved. October13 TKA protocol update does not establish a new result; no new SL1002/VX993 numerical results recovered.

Informal-source coverage: Targeted pain Reddit searches surfaced old suzetrigine treatment experiences and review reposts; no distinct new program signal selected. Experiences do not establish chronic pain efficacy; full clinician podcasts remain unreviewed.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-10-09

SL1002 completes pivotal knee-pain enrollment; readout forecast for Q2 2027

Source date: October 8, 2026; enrollment-completion event October 2. Saol reports completed enrollment for BEACON (NCT07226258), randomized masked phase 3 SL1002 versus placebo for knee-OA pain at over twenty U.S. sites. SL1002 is a targeted perineural chemoneurolytic injection. The primary endpoint is week-12 change in walking-pain intensity; this is symptom treatment, not cartilage regeneration.

Limits/safety: No new effect estimate, participant disposition or harms table. The August 25 registry still says recruiting with 150 estimated participants; it is stale relative to the sponsor milestone and does not establish the final analyzed sample. Chronic pain/function, durability and nerve-related harms need comparative results.

U.S./next: Investigational. Sponsor forecasts topline Q2 2027 and plans another phase 3 knee study. A granted End-of-Phase-2 FDA meeting concerns a separate spasticity program; meeting permission is neither agreement on final design nor approval.

October 8 original sponsor release; registry.

Suzetrigine’s long-term diabetic-neuropathy study closes recruitment

Registry updated October 9, 2026. NCT06696443, the suzetrigine painful-diabetic-peripheral-neuropathy extension, is now active, not recruiting, with 455 actual participants. It began December 18, 2024 and has estimated primary/final completion January 25, 2027. The single-arm open-label design primarily assesses adverse and serious adverse events through week 54; symptoms and health status are secondary.

Limits/safety/U.S.: No results are posted. Enrollment closure is not study completion, demonstrated safety or a positive efficacy readout. This extension cannot isolate a treatment effect without a comparator. Suzetrigine’s existing acute-pain approval does not establish a diabetic-neuropathy indication.

Next: Completion is estimated, not a promised result date. Follow the separate randomized pivotal efficacy studies and eventual label decisions.

Primary registry.

New randomized knee-replacement study tests suzetrigine’s opioid-sparing effect

First posted October 8, 2026; registry-reported actual start October 7. NCT07864896 plans 148 participants in a randomized, masked phase 3 suzetrigine-versus-placebo trial at Hospital for Special Surgery. Primary total knee arthroplasty patients receive study treatment for fourteen days. The primary endpoint is cumulative opioid consumption over forty-eight hours; secondary pain and opioid-use assessments continue through later postoperative visits.

Limits/safety/U.S.: No results or harms rates. Less rescue opioid use would need interpretation alongside pain control, ambulation and adverse effects. One primary time-frame line mistakenly says THA despite a TKA protocol; retain this registry inconsistency. Research extends evidence for an already acute-pain-approved drug and is not a new chronic-pain approval.

Next: Recruiting; January 2029 primary and January 2030 final completion are month-precision estimates, not publication promises.

Primary registry.

Remaining gaps: All saved named NCT records refreshed and all pages of official overlap discovery screened (49 returned records). Search starts September 5/6 from the last full successful check, not October 6 alone. Incidental matches excluded; literature, international registries, all regulatory files and complete podcast/audio appraisal remain incomplete.; Broad trial discovery also located NIH experimental-pain HNK and another rotator-cuff suzetrigine study, not promoted as patient efficacy. Full VX-993 and other chronic-pain safety, surgery abstracts and international records remain incompletely appraised.

Informal-source coverage: Read original r/anesthesiology Journavx thread. Anonymous clinician/patient accounts conflict on relief and opioid substitution; mixed regimens, uncontrolled samples and unverified insurance claims are not trial outcomes or reliable coverage estimates. No distinctive formal-development rumor selected; full Radiolab/podcast audio not appraised.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-10-06

Recovered baseline: small postoperative suzetrigine study lacks a control arm

Baseline source date: Published online August 8, 2026, not a new October trial; October is the journal issue. Evidence: Open-label single-arm phase 4 NCT06887959.

Forty-seven adults undergoing arthroscopic/laparoscopic surgery received suzetrigine within a multimodal analgesic regimen for up to 14 days. Good/very-good/excellent end-of-treatment ratings occurred in 90.9%; 76.1% did not require opioid rescue. One aspiration serious adverse event was considered unrelated.

Limits: Sponsor-supported, small and uncontrolled. Acetaminophen, anti-inflammatory medicines and procedure-specific adjuncts contribute to analgesia; no causal opioid-sparing comparison or chronic-pain efficacy is established.

U.S./next milestone: Existing adult acute-pain approval is separate from investigational chronic uses. Controlled trials remain needed; no readout inferred.

Full primary paper; registry.

New randomized study tests suzetrigine after urogynecologic surgery

Source date: October 2, 2026 first registry posting. Evidence: NCT07856654, planned phase 4 randomized masked study in 48 adults after urogynecologic surgery.

Suzetrigine or matching placebo is added to the same multimodal analgesic background. Primary outcome: seven-day change in pain score. Secondary measures include opioid consumption, recovery satisfaction and tolerability.

Limits/safety/U.S.: Not yet recruiting; no benefit or safety result. Existing acute-pain authorization is not evidence this specific regimen improves recovery.

Next: November 2026 start, December 2027 primary completion and May 2028 final completion are registry estimates, not promised readouts.

Primary registry.

Review coverage and remaining gaps

Coverage: Official registry overlap discovery

Remaining gaps: Named registry refresh and overlap discovery completed; comprehensive literature, all regulatory files and informal transcripts remain incomplete. Full-topic successful-check date is preserved. Official registry discovery returned 40 records, from all returned pages; appraisal focused on named programs and new first postings. Incidental matches were excluded. Full LTG321/onzotrigine regulatory correspondence, VX-993 detail and all pain-mechanism literature not appraised.

Informal-source coverage: Focused Reddit and named-program searches; anecdotes/reposts were not treated as trial evidence. Broader podcast/talk coverage remains incomplete.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-10-02

Historical baseline: pamidronate missed the primary chronic low-back-pain endpoint

Source/event date: 2026-07-23. Evidence: Peer-reviewed randomized pilot-trial abstract; historical context.

PEPTIDE randomized 44 adults aged 18–60 with chronic inflammatory-like low back pain, Modic type 1 MRI changes and inadequate NSAID response to two daily 90-mg pamidronate infusions or placebo. At three months, the primary pain-score difference was −6.4 mm on a 100-mm scale (95% CI −22.0 to 9.3), without statistically significant benefit. A six-week difference also crossed zero. Adverse events occurred in 54.6% versus 27.3%, mainly influenza-like symptoms. This small trial does not establish durable analgesia, fracture healing or cartilage repair. The paper appeared online July 23 and in a September issue; this is recovered baseline context, not October news. Primary abstract.

Next milestone: No confirmatory-trial milestone or date verified.

Primary abstract.

Review coverage and remaining gaps

Coverage: onzotrigine LTG321 September 2026 phase 2 phase 3; PEPTIDE pamidronate trial September 2026; Journavx VX993 Tonmya PAINweek September 2026; NCT06628908 current registry.

Remaining gaps: NCT06628908 June 15 registry remains recruiting, May 31 2027 estimated primary/final; other DPN trial NCT07231419 not refreshed, so do not globally replace April milestone. September 3 Latigo/SEC baseline lead: LTG321 once-daily knee-OA phase 2 crossover ~120 participants Denmark, H2 2027 forecast; onzotrigine phase 3 plans. Trial IDs and claimed original NEJM paper not matched. Not selected as efficacy news. Tonix poster landing page checked, PDFs not appraised. VX993, full safety and broad registry census incomplete. PEPTIDE PMC blocked but original PubMed abstract read.

Informal-source coverage: No additional attributable signal selected in this focused search; Off-label Journavx anecdotes not treated as trial outcomes; broader informal sweep incomplete.

Next update: Suzetrigine/VX-993 enrollment forecasts and neuropathy outcome windows remain separate from approved acute-pain use; no new confirmatory PEPTIDE date.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-09-27

NOHARM reduces opioid exposure without improving pain interference or function

Source date: 2026-09-25. Event date: 2026-09-25. Evidence: Peer-reviewed cluster randomized trial.

An integrated nonpharmacologic perioperative-care strategy reduced opioid exposure but did not improve its coprimary patient-reported outcomes. NOHARM included 68,141 surgical procedures across 22 practices at six U.S. centers. Adjusted PROMIS differences were .09 for pain interference (95% CI −.18 to .36; p=.51) and .15 for physical function (−.11 to .41; p=.27). Secondary opioid exposure rate ratio was .90 (.82–.99; p=.03). Trial: NCT04570371.

Limitations: Stepped-wedge cluster design; procedure count is not unique-patient count. Prescription/administration records are not complete consumption data. Approximately 70% patient-reported response and a predominantly White single-system population limit generalizability.

Safety: No significant adverse-event or utilization change reported. Reduced opioid exposure is not demonstrated prevention of addiction or mortality.

U.S. status: A care-delivery intervention, not a new drug approval.

Next milestone: Replication and longer-term implementation outcomes; timing unknown.

NOHARM randomized clinical trial, JAMA Network Open.

Review coverage and remaining gaps

Coverage: NOHARM original trial and suzetrigine diabetic-neuropathy registry; selected September non-opioid trial/conference discovery.

Remaining gaps: VX-993, Tonmya and full PAINWeek source packets not comprehensively refreshed. Suzetrigine DPN registry remains recruiting with estimated April 6, 2027 primary completion, not a current result.

Informal-source coverage: Reddit Journavx/CRPS anecdotes searched; no new source-grounded development claim selected. Patient experiences were not recast as trial efficacy.

Next update: Suzetrigine DPN registry primary completion April 6, 2027 remains estimated; current acute-pain availability is a separate question.

Full coverage record.

Focused update — 2026-09-22

CagriSema reports a Phase 2 painful-neuropathy signal

Source date: 2026-09-21. Event date: 2026-09-21. Evidence: Sponsor topline announcement.

Novo reported improved pain ratings in type 2 diabetes with painful peripheral neuropathy, and plans Phase 3 neuropathy trials across its portfolio during 2027. NCT06797869 randomized quadruple-masked trial: registry enrollment 142; slide analysis n=141. At the registered 32-week endpoint, CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg reduced PI-NRS by 2.4 points versus 1.3 with placebo, from baseline 6.4; efficacy estimand, on top of standard care. More than 53% of treated participants achieved ≥30% pain reduction; comparator response not supplied.

Limitations: Sponsor slide only, no CI or exact p-value; pain relief is not nerve regeneration or prevention of diabetic complications. Analysis and enrollment denominators differ.

Safety: Only qualitative statement that safety/tolerability resembled prior CagriSema trials; no new quantitative table.

U.S. status: Investigational for this use; no new U.S. approval.

Next milestone: Phase 3 trials in painful diabetic neuropathy during 2027, sponsor plan with no specific start date.

Novo Diabetes CMD, slide 10; NCT06797869 registry.

Related findings:

Review coverage and remaining gaps

Coverage: Refreshed newly noticed suzetrigine pelvic-surgery protocol; searched chronic/neuropathic non-opioid developments, with CagriSema neuropathy and CBL514 Dercum results cross-linked from metabolic review.

Remaining gaps: Pelvic-surgery trial is older May registration, not yet recruiting; November1 start/July2027 primary completion remain estimates. Full PAINWeek Mohs tables, VX993/Tonmya and all new mechanisms not fully reviewed.

Informal-source coverage: September21 CRPS Journavx discussion is individual off-label experience, not a new trial or reliable efficacy rumor. https://www.reddit.com/r/CRPS/comments/1wlyinj/journavx/

Full coverage record.

Next update: Larger neuropathy outcomes remain pending; Ketamir-2 site initiation is still sponsor-targeted Q1 2027. No approved new chronic-pain indication follows from the new pilots.

Focused update — 2026-09-18

Ketamir-2 prepares a controlled neuropathy trial

Source date: 2026-09-17. Evidence: Sponsor protocol-development announcement.

MIRA submitted a phase 2a chemotherapy-induced neuropathy protocol for ethics review; site initiation is targeted for Q1 2027, not confirmed underway. After FDA feedback, the planned randomized double-blind crossover study compares oral Ketamir-2 300 mg, 600 mg and placebo across three seven-day periods with washouts in adults with persistent moderate-to-severe chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Enrollment size and a matched registry identifier were not established in the release.

Limitations: Healthy-volunteer phase 1 tolerability does not establish pain relief, function or chronic safety in patients. This oral NMDA-modulator program is distinct from approved suzetrigine and from psychedelic depression trials.

Safety: Sponsor reports no serious events or dose-limiting toxicity in phase 1; phase 2 comparative safety and CNS effects remain unmeasured.

U.S. status: Investigational; FDA protocol review and an active IND are not marketing approval.

Next milestone: Q1 2027 site initiation is conditional on IRB review and activation. An October 5–6 presentation concerns phase 1/development, not phase 2 efficacy.

MIRA, September 17.

Review coverage and remaining gaps

Coverage: Ketamir-2 planned phase2 original release, suzetrigine DPN and orthopedic registry refresh, Mohs paper metadata. This is a focused review, not a complete re-review of every program.

Remaining gaps: Mohs paper has no retrieved abstract/full results; VX993/Tonmya and other pain mechanisms not fully refreshed. Orthopedic registry start is September month-only estimate, not confirmed Sept30 initiation.

Informal-source coverage: Suzetrigine podcast/CAPC talk leads found; full recordings not reviewed. Secondary Ketamir stories incorrectly implied initiation; original says Q1 2027 forecast, not current dosing.

Full coverage record.

Next expected update: Suzetrigine and VX-993 neuropathy enrollment targeted by end-2026; results dates not verified.

Tracked programs and current evidence

Journavx / suzetrigine — approved acute pain; chronic uses remain investigational

Suzetrigine / VX-548 / Journavx is a selective peripheral NaV1.8 sodium-channel inhibitor. The FDA approved it on January 30, 2025 for moderate-to-severe acute pain in adults. Two randomized 48-hour trials after abdominoplasty (NCT05558410) and bunionectomy (NCT05553366) established superiority over placebo on time-weighted pain reduction. A separate open-label trial, NCT05661734, contributed safety data. FDA trial review and approval summary.

The active comparator was hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and rescue ibuprofen was allowed. The studies did not establish superiority to that opioid combination: its average pain-relief score was slightly lower than suzetrigine after abdominoplasty and higher after bunionectomy. Approval therefore should not be restated as proof of superior opioid replacement across surgeries. Common adverse reactions included itching, muscle spasms, creatine-phosphokinase elevation, and rash. Longer treatment and other populations require separate evidence. FDA efficacy and safety tables.

For painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), the program includes phase 3 studies NCT06628908 and NCT07231419, plus an open-label long-term study, NCT06696443. Vertex's August 2026 update expects enrollment in both pivotal trials to finish by year-end 2026. That is an enrollment milestone, not a promised results date or a chronic-pain approval. Trial 1; trial 2; long-term study; current sponsor timeline.

Important counterexample: the December 2024 painful lumbosacral radiculopathy phase 2 study reported mean pain reductions of 2.02 points with suzetrigine versus 1.98 with placebo at week 12. Its primary analysis was change within the treated group, which was statistically significant; it was not designed or powered to establish a between-group difference. This does not demonstrate efficacy beyond placebo in radiculopathy, despite the company's “met primary endpoint” description. Sponsor's full phase 2 result.

VX-993 — neuropathic program continues after acute-pain setback

Vertex's next NaV1.8 inhibitor, VX-993, remains investigational. The company decided not to advance it as acute-pain monotherapy because its phase 2 efficacy did not suggest superiority to suzetrigine. This was a development decision about that use, not discontinuation of the molecule: a phase 2 DPN trial continues, with enrollment completion also projected by the end of 2026. Watch whether any incremental efficacy justifies the new program and whether tolerability remains acceptable over chronic exposure. Vertex annual filing; August 2026 pipeline update.

Tonmya — new fibromyalgia formulation/indication, modest average benefit

Tonmya / TNX-102 SL is sublingual cyclobenzaprine, a centrally acting drug with a long-established active ingredient, newly approved for adult fibromyalgia on August 15, 2025. This is a new formulation and indication, not a newly discovered molecular class. Approval announcement; current prescribing information.

The peer-reviewed RESILIENT trial, NCT05273749, analyzed 456 participants over 14 weeks. Average pain decreased by 1.8 points versus 1.2 with placebo, with statistically significant benefits in sleep, fatigue, and other prespecified outcomes. An earlier trial, RALLY, did not significantly separate from placebo; both successes and that failure belong in the record. The studies do not establish superiority to duloxetine, pregabalin, or existing oral cyclobenzaprine. RESILIENT publication; sponsor's three-trial disclosure.

Local mouth reactions are frequent: pooled labeling reports oral numbness in 23% versus 0.7% and somnolence in 6% versus 2%. The label also contains cardiac contraindications and serotonin-syndrome warnings relevant to combinations with some antidepressants. Longer-term effectiveness and comparative tolerability deserve monitoring. Prescribing information.

Expected next updates

Program Next meaningful update Timing and confidence
Suzetrigine DPN Completion of pivotal enrollment, then controlled readouts Sponsor window: enrollment by end of 2026; no firm results date verified. current sponsor timeline.
VX-993 DPN Phase 2 enrollment completion and results Sponsor window: enrollment by end of 2026; no firm results date verified. current sponsor timeline.
Journavx acute pain; Tonmya fibromyalgia Controlled comparative data, expanded safety experience, label changes No firm date verified for the next practice-changing readout.
What we’re watching
  • Which new mechanisms provide meaningful pain relief, better function or sleep, and less rescue medication use?
  • Does efficacy extend from short postoperative pain studies to chronic neuropathic or nociplastic pain?
  • How do treatments compare with active alternatives, and what are the discontinuation, interaction, and longer-term safety burdens?
  • Include formal human studies and negative results. Separate postoperative pain, diabetic neuropathic pain, radiculopathy, and fibromyalgia rather than pooling them as one indication.
Sources & reading list24 links
  1. October 8 original sponsor releasesaolrx.com
  2. registryclinicaltrials.gov
  3. Primary registryclinicaltrials.gov
  4. Primary registryclinicaltrials.gov
  5. Full primary paperlink.springer.com
  6. registryclinicaltrials.gov
  7. Primary registryclinicaltrials.gov
  8. Primary abstractpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  9. NOHARM randomized clinical trial, JAMA Network Openjamanetwork.com
  10. Novo Diabetes CMD, slide 10novonordisk.com
  11. NCT06797869 registryclinicaltrials.gov
  12. MIRA, September 17globenewswire.com
  13. FDA trial review and approval summaryfda.gov
  14. Trial 1clinicaltrials.gov
  15. trial 2clinicaltrials.gov
  16. current sponsor timelineinvestors.vrtx.com
  17. Sponsor's full phase 2 resultinvestors.vrtx.com
  18. Vertex annual filingsec.gov
  19. Approval announcementir.tonixpharma.com
  20. current prescribing informationdailymed.nlm.nih.gov
  21. RESILIENT publicationpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  22. sponsor's three-trial disclosuretonmyahcp.com
  23. Original conference abstractpainweek2026.eventscribe.net
  24. September 10 Mohs-surgery randomized paperdoi.org
Dated research history

2026-10-02 — Scheduled focused review

1 newly recorded findings or milestones; primary evidence, uncertainty and incomplete coverage are detailed above and in the run record. Full-topic successful-check dates remain unchanged.

  • 2026-09-27: 1 sourced entries and 0 cross-topic links from a focused scheduled check. Coverage and remaining gaps.

  • 2026-09-22: Focused scheduled research retry; 1 sourced entries and 1 cross-topic links. Coverage and gaps.

September 14, 2026 — focused ad-hoc review

September 10 — PAINWeek abstract P062, retrospective historical-control comparison. At one center, 104 knee-arthroplasty patients included 52 prescribed suzetrigine within multimodal care and 52 earlier controls. No opioid refill by two weeks occurred in 57.7% versus 34.6% (p=.018); 88.5% versus 65.4% were opioid-free at six weeks (p=.005), but the latter comparison was not significant among opioid-naive patients (p=.054). Pain and functional recovery did not differ significantly. Prior opioid-use differences, historical controls and prescribing/dispensing uncertainty prevent a causal conclusion. Detailed comparative safety was not reported. This is not a new indication or evidence for chronic neuropathic pain; prospective replication is needed, with no firm next date identified. Original conference abstract.

Access and coverage gaps: The September 10 Mohs-surgery randomized paper was identified, but its original full text/abstract could not be retrieved; no outcome is inferred from the title. Suzetrigine/VX-993 and new-entry searches did not substantiate a new chronic-neuropathic efficacy result. Vertex’s full DPN/VX-993 registry set and Tonmya were not comprehensively refreshed. Indexed informal timing leads lacked completed sponsor/registry verification and remain unpromoted; this was not a complete podcast/interview sweep.

Dated findings

  • 2026-09-12 baseline: acute-pain and fibromyalgia approvals established; DPN remains investigational. Negative radiculopathy evidence and the VX-993 acute-pain development decision are retained as material findings.

2026-09-18 — Scheduled focused review

Ketamir-2 planned phase2 original release, suzetrigine DPN and orthopedic registry refresh, Mohs paper metadata. Original event dates, safety and limitations are retained in the September 18 update above. The complete-topic successful-check date was not advanced because the listed gaps remain. Run record.